Croft facing closure after appeal loss.
The Croft circuit has lost its appeal against having to pay damages to three peo😼ple who claim their lives have been 🅘affected by 'noise nuisance', leaving its future in jeopardy.
Derek and Julꩵia Watson, together with their daughter Jill Wilson, have lived within 300 metres of the circuit in Dalton-on-Tees for several years, but took a case to the High Court last year claiming to be💫 victims of 'noise nuisance'.
The judge r♔uled in their favour, ordering the circuit's promoters Corft Promo-Sport Ltd to pay Mr and Mrs Watson ?🐟109,600 damages and Mrs Wilson ?40,000.
The Croft circuit has lost its appeal against having to pay damages to three people 💞who claim their lives have been affected by 'noise nuisance', leaving its future in jeopardy.
Derek and Julia Watson, together with their daughter Jill💛 Wilson, have lived within 300 metres of the circuit in Da🐼lton-on-Tees for several years, but took a case to the High Court last year claiming to be victims of 'noise nuisance'.
The judge ruled in their favour, ordering the circuit's promoters Coꦕrft Promo-Sport Ltd to pay Mr and Mrs Watson ?109,600 damages and Mrs Wilson ?40,000.
Now, Croft Promo-Sport Ltd have lost their appeal to dismiss the order⛦ and have the damages, which include a reported ?700,000 bill of legal costs, reduced.
Furthermore, they have been slapped with an additional injunction to limit activities to 40 days a year. Currently, Croft, which hosts British Superbike and British Tourinꦏg car events is active between 45 and 50 days a y🐻ear.
According to the Northern Echo newspaper, Richard Jones QC argued th൩at the circuit had 'changed the character' of the area to such an extent that the noise levels were reasonable.
However, Appeal Court judge Sir Andrew Morritt claimed he could find no legal flaw in the original ruling that the Watsons and Mrs Wilson had suffered an🐠 'actionable nuisance'. He went on to claim it was 'illogical' the injunction of 40 days hadn't been installed.
While the Watsons a🤡nd Mrs Wilson insist they didn't have an issue with the large events that take place, they were against the public track days that take place at other times of the year.
Refused the opportunity to ap♛peal to the House of Lords, Croft has also been ordered to pay ?120,000 of legal costs straight away.
The QC went on to claim it is worried this ruling will raise a serious precedent for other circuits around the country, with🍎 neighbouring landowners potentially beingꦿ prompted into action against noise pollution.
It remains to be seen whether the large legal bil🐈ls Croft faces means it will 𒁃be able to stave off closure.
