'Wings, Chins' remain under stricter 2020 MotoGP aero rules
The swingarm spoilers, nicknamed '🤡spoons' or 'chins', that ignited a feud between manufacturers in Qatar this year will still be legal under ♍MotoGP's stricter aerodynamic regulations in 2020.
However, the devices - plus any other areas𒐪 of the bike with 'aerodynamic effect' - will now fall under Aero Body rules, which allow only one design 🦂update per season.
All current fairings and 'integrated wing' a🔯ttachmen🌄ts will also remain legal, but with much clearer limits on size and shape to act as a "roof" for future development.

The swingarm spoilers, nicknamed 'spoons' or 'chins', that ignited a 💛feud between manufacturers in Qatar this year will still be legal under Mot♚oGP's stricter aerodynamic regulations in 2020.
However, the devices - plus any other areas of the bike with 'aerodynamic effect' - will now fall under Aero Body rules, which all𓃲ow only one design update per season.
All current fairings and 'integrated wing' attachments will also remain legal, but with much clearer limits on size and shape to act as a "roof" for future ꦦdevelopment.
"We believe that once you have a good base with the technical regulations, stability pays off in terms of cost control and closing the technical gap between the teams," MotoGP Director of Technology Corrado Cecchinelli told wuqian0821.com.
But in the case of aerodynamics, there had been no choi🌳ce but to act: "We did something only because we had a problem to address."

MotoGP banned the use ꦛof normal 'protruding' wings on safety grounds at the start of 2018 but gave the green light to 'integrated' wing devices.
The deliberately minimal regulations rely on Technical Director Danny Aldr🐽idge having the final say on what is allowed, often meaning a back-and-forth design process between Aldridge and a manufacturer until an agreement is reached.
Helped by an ever-growing list of guidelines from Aldridge, plus use 🔥of a metal jig to check the main measurements, most manufacturers have now settled on similar variations of hollow loops or box-style wing attachments on the s🦂ide and/or front of their fairings.
But unexpected developments at the other end of the bike caused more controversy, with four manufacturers (Honda, Suzuki, KTM and Aprilia) protesting Ducati's use of a swingarm-mounted 'tyre cooler' ('spoiler/spoon/chin') at the Qatar season-opener. Yamaha, which inspired Ducati's design by creating an earlier 'rain deflector' inꦑ the same area, did not protest.
The swingarm device argument escalated to the MotoGP Court of Appeal, which confirmed its legality, but the case underlined why more detailed ♓aerodynamic regulations were needed for 2020.
"Basically, we had a problem of borderline interpretation of the regulations and so ꧟we had to act to narrow this border," Cecchinelli sai♑d.
"I hope I can speak for the manufacturers when I say that they are all very happy with the measures we took, because iওt 𒀰will be clearer for everybody."
So what will change in 2020?

The current Aero Body rules only apply to the Fairing and Front Fender.
Swingarm Spoilers
"The infamous 'chin'… will still be legal, but now it will become a homologated part," Cecchinelli 𒉰explained.
"As you know, we split the outside of the motorcycle into different areas that we call the Aero Body. You are only allowed to make one design update to each Aero Body area durಌing the season.
"At the moment there ar𝓡e two Aero Body areas: The Fairing and Front Fender. From next year there will be another Ae💧ro Body area covering the swingarm."
That means: "If you change the design of the 'chin', including if you simply remove it completely, it will count as your ♋one update for the season in that area."
To pre-empt a repeat of the swingarm saga, the same Aero Body restrictions will also apply to any other part of the bike that is deemed to ♈have "an aerodynamic effect".
"For instance, the fork leg cover will be automatically considered as꧅ part of the Aero Body. So it is allowed to be shaped [aerodynamically], but that shape can only be changed once during the season," said Cecchinelli.
'Aerodynamic effect'
Ducati's rivals protested the 'chin' on the grounds that it was 'primarily an aerodynamic device'. The Italian factory countered by presenting evidence that the device's&n🍌bsp;main purpose was to make the rear tyre cooler, with ꧅downforce described as a minor 'secondary' effect.
Much depends on how you int♛erpret the words 'aerodynamic effect', an agreed definition of 🍌which will now be included in the 2020 rules.
"There will be a very complicated and, in some ways, still subjective ꧋wording to 🎐define 'aerodynamic effect'. But it will be much clearer than now," Cecchinelli said.
"It basically says that, every component or part of a component that has a design that is not necessary for its basiꩲc function will automatically be considered 🍰part of the Aero Body.
"That means if you have a normal swingarm shape it won't be considered part of the Aero♓ Body, because the shape is purely to carry out a mechanical fu🤡nction.
"But if you were to sculpt the swingarm surface using a monocoque design to include the 'chin' as one piece, then the whole swingarm would become part of the Aero Body. So be careful, because then🌟 you cou💮ld only change the swingarm design once during the season."
🐬To avoid that scenario, Cecchinelli expects all manufacturers to run𒁏 a non-aerodynamic swingarm shape, with the aerodynamic 'chin' part bolted on separately.

Dimensions, angles, radius
In terms of the main fairing design and associated wing attachments, Cecchinelli said that for 2020 "more dimensional constraints" would be added, including "radii, angles and measureme🥀nts" to put a "roof for the future."
"There will be a much ♑smaller grey area, but there will always be some grey area," he warnဣed.
All of the fairings currently seen on track would still b♏e le♍gal next season, to avoid unfairly penalising anyone.
"Nobody hasღ to change their current designs. In every respect we checked the existing fairing designs ⛎and set the new, more precise limits using what exists now, so nobody has to take a step backwards."
'More patches in future'
Cecchinelli describes the steps taken 🥃for the 2020 rules as "a good job, meaning not bad and not perfect" but knows new aerodynamic issues will eventually arise.
"Honestly, it wasn't that difficult to reach a better solutio𓂃n because the manufacturers were all very collaborative. But don’t expect that there won’t be any more pit holes in the future and don't call us stupid if it happens! Because this is the way it goes," he said.
"The [manufacturers] have far morꦗe people than us and𓃲 their job is to go to the extremes.
"Rem💛ember, Formula One🥀 has decades more experience than us with aerodynamic rules and they still have problems. Someone is smarter and then the organiser has to catch-up. It's part of the game.
"It's always a case of putting patches over the holes, just like adding a software update🦹 for your mobile phone to meet a changing si🅷tuation. So the rules will need to change again one day, but I hope not very soon."
Indeed, Cecchinelli confirmed that no significant new technical rules are in the pipeline for the next five-year contract between the m🌸anufacturers and Dorna, which starts in 2022.
"There's an agreement to aim for technical rule ♎stability over the term of the current contract, which expires in 2021," he said. "But it is also our intention not to change anything significant at the beginning of the next term, starting from 2022.
"We are noౠt just waiting for the current contract term to expire before introducin♕g something big for 2022. The plan is always consistency."
That includes no big changes t💙o the single electronics.
"We have no plans, in any of the categor🗹ies, to make any important software evolutions. We are always changing small bits, but not something big like removing [corner-by-corner set-up] or traction control," Cecchinelli confirmed.
"That also means the Moto2 ECU w🐟ill be the same next year, so no⛦ traction control."


Peter has been in the paddock for 20 years and has seen Valentino Rossi co﷽me and go. He is at the forefront of the Suzuki exit story and Marc Marquez’s injury issues.